1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 891 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1954 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1954 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ | XC60 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2748 mm |