1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ. 2012 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1954 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1954 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Jeep CJ | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3151 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
