1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2012 Subaru Forester is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Forester (145 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Forester weights approximately 370 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Forester (350 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2012 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ | Forester |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4559 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1674 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2616 mm |