1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Jeep CJ | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | CJ | Camaro |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3151 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2852 mm |