1954 Jeep CJ vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 822 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Jeep CJ | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Jeep | Jaguar |
| Model | CJ | XF |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3151 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2909 mm |
