1954 Lancia Appia vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1322 kg more than 1954 Lancia Appia.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Lancia Appia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1954 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1954 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Lancia Appia | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Appia | XC90 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2720 mm |