1954 Lancia Appia vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1954 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1954 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Lancia Appia | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Appia | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2340 mm |