1954 Maserati 250 vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Triumph 2000 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati 250 (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 2000. (90 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1954 Maserati 250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Maserati 250 | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Maserati | Triumph |
Model | 250 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1250 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |