1954 Maserati 250 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati 250 (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1954 Maserati 250.
Because 1954 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Maserati 250 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | 250 | Clio |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1810 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2580 mm |