1954 Maserati 250 vs. 2010 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2010 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Ridgeline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati 250 (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2010 Honda Ridgeline. (250 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Ridgeline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Ridgeline weights approximately 791 kg more than 1954 Maserati 250.
Because 2010 Honda Ridgeline is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Maserati 250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Honda Ridgeline has automatic transmission and 1954 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1954 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Honda Ridgeline will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati 250 | 2010 Honda Ridgeline | |
| Make | Maserati | Honda |
| Model | 250 | Ridgeline |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1461 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3110 mm |
