1954 Maserati 250 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati 250 (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 831 kg more than 1954 Maserati 250.
Because 1954 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1954 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1954 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Maserati 250 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | 250 | 6 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1501 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2789 mm |