1954 Maserati 250 vs. 2010 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1954 Maserati 250. (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati 250.
Because 1954 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota Highlander has automatic transmission and 1954 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1954 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota Highlander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati 250 | 2010 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Maserati | Toyota |
| Model | 250 | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2789 mm |
