1954 Maserati A6G vs. 1963 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 1963 BMW 3200 CS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 3200 CS weights approximately 450 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati A6G | 1963 BMW 3200 CS | |
| Make | Maserati | BMW |
| Model | A6G | 3200 CS |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3169 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2840 mm |
