1954 Maserati A6G vs. 1980 Triumph TR8
To start off, 1980 Triumph TR8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,523 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (168 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Triumph TR8. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1980 Triumph TR8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Triumph TR8 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati A6G | 1980 Triumph TR8 | |
| Make | Maserati | Triumph |
| Model | A6G | TR8 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 138 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2170 mm |
