1954 Maserati A6G vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 855 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 1954 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1954 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati A6G | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Maserati | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A6G | SSU |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |
