1954 Maserati A6G vs. 2006 Volvo S80
To start off, 2006 Volvo S80 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,920 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S80 (268 HP @ 1800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Because 1954 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Volvo S80 has automatic transmission and 1954 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1954 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo S80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Maserati A6G | 2006 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | A6G | S80 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2920 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2800 mm |