1954 Maserati A6G vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo S40 weights approximately 289 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati A6G | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | S40 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1339 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
