1954 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (168 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (141 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 587 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Because 1954 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati A6G | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Maserati | Kia |
| Model | A6G | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1337 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2660 mm |
