1954 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Maserati A6G | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | A6G | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1390 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
