1954 Maserati A6G vs. 2012 BMW M3
To start off, 2012 BMW M3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (168 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW M3 weights approximately 905 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Maserati A6G | 2012 BMW M3 | |
Make | Maserati | BMW |
Model | A6G | M3 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1803 mm |
Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1424 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2761 mm |