1954 Maserati A6G vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 993 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Maserati A6G | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | A6G | S60 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1733 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2776 mm |