1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
| Model | 300 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2490 mm |
