1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
| Model | 300 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2860 mm |
