1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3710 mm |