1954 Mercedes-Benz S vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz S would be higher. At 2,193 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1954 Mercedes-Benz S. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1954 Mercedes-Benz S.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Mercedes-Benz S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Mercedes-Benz S. (157 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Mercedes-Benz S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Mercedes-Benz S | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Citroen |
| Model | S | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2193 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
