1954 Mercury Monterey vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 4,183 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 650 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 1954 Mercury Monterey is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Mercury Monterey. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Mercury Monterey | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Monterey | Clio |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4183 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Top Speed | 156 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2480 mm |