1954 Opel Rekord vs. 2003 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Octavia is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Skoda Octavia (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1954 Opel Rekord. (44 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1954 Opel Rekord.
Because 1954 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Opel Rekord | 2003 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Opel | Skoda |
Model | Rekord | Octavia |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2520 mm |