1954 Opel Rekord vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2003 Toyota Tundra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1954 Opel Rekord. (44 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1954 Opel Rekord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 785 kg more than 1954 Opel Rekord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Opel Rekord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Opel Rekord | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Opel | Toyota |
Model | Rekord | Tundra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3270 mm |