1954 Plymouth Belvedere vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere (156 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Plymouth | Holden |
| Model | Belvedere | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2685 mm |
