1954 Plymouth Belvedere vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Camry (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere weights approximately 60 kg more than 2010 Toyota Camry.
Because 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Plymouth Belvedere | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
Model | Belvedere | Camry |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4806 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2776 mm |