1954 Plymouth Belvedere vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 10 kg more than 1954 Plymouth Belvedere.
Because 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Plymouth | Ford |
| Model | Belvedere | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2788 mm |
