1954 Pontiac Star Chief vs. 2010 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2010 Ford Fusion is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Fusion weights approximately 37 kg more than 1954 Pontiac Star Chief.
Because 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Pontiac Star Chief | 2010 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Pontiac | Ford |
| Model | Star Chief | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4715 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4841 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2728 mm |
