1954 Porsche 356 vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Polo (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1954 Porsche 356. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1954 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 271 kg more than 1954 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Porsche 356 | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Porsche | Volkswagen |
Model | 356 | Polo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2410 mm |