1954 Renault Juva vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 607 kg more than 1954 Renault Juva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1954 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1954 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Renault Juva | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Juva | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 236 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1352 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2800 mm |