1954 Riley RM A vs. 1965 AC Cobra
To start off, 1965 AC Cobra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 225 kg more than 1965 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Riley RM A | 1965 AC Cobra | |
Make | Riley | AC |
Model | RM A | Cobra |
Year Released | 1954 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 267 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2290 mm |