1954 Riley RM A vs. 1970 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 1970 Subaru FF-1 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 509 kg more than 1970 Subaru FF-1.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Subaru FF-1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Riley RM A | 1970 Subaru FF-1 | |
Make | Riley | Subaru |
Model | RM A | FF-1 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1970 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1267 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 80 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 726 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |