1954 Riley RM A vs. 1972 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1972 Toyota Celica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 89 kg more than 1972 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Riley RM A | 1972 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | Celica |
Year Released | 1954 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1146 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |