1954 Riley RM A vs. 1984 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1984 Toyota Cressida is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 130 kg more than 1984 Toyota Cressida.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Toyota Cressida has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Toyota Cressida will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 1984 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Cressida |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1984 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2759 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |
