1954 Riley RM A vs. 2001 BMW Z8
To start off, 2001 BMW Z8 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z8 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2001 BMW Z8 | |
| Make | Riley | BMW |
| Model | RM A | Z8 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4939 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2580 mm |
