1954 Riley RM A vs. 2001 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2001 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 379 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 2001 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2001 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1614 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3010 mm |
