1954 Riley RM A vs. 2005 Scion tC
To start off, 2005 Scion tC is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,361 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Scion tC weights approximately 83 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Scion tC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2005 Scion tC | |
| Make | Riley | Scion |
| Model | RM A | tC |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2361 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1318 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |
