1954 Riley RM A vs. 2005 Volvo S80
To start off, 2005 Volvo S80 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S80 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Volvo S80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Volvo S80 has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo S80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2005 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Riley | Volvo |
| Model | RM A | S80 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2800 mm |
