1954 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2010 Fiat Panda is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 110 kg more than 2010 Fiat Panda.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Riley RM A | 2010 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Riley | Fiat |
Model | RM A | Panda |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2310 mm |