1954 Riley RM A vs. 2012 BMW 316
To start off, 2012 BMW 316 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 316 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2012 BMW 316 | |
| Make | Riley | BMW |
| Model | RM A | 316 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1495 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4624 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1429 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2810 mm |
