1954 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Hyundai Equus
To start off, 2012 Hyundai Equus is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Hyundai Equus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Hyundai Equus weights approximately 800 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Hyundai Equus has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Hyundai Equus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2012 Hyundai Equus | |
| Make | Riley | Hyundai |
| Model | RM A | Equus |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 429 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5159 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1491 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3045 mm |
