1954 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2012 Toyota Avalon is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Avalon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Avalon weights approximately 385 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Avalon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Avalon has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Avalon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Riley RM A | 2012 Toyota Avalon | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | Avalon |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5019 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1486 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2819 mm |