1954 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 565 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Riley | Jaguar |
| Model | RM A | XK |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4794 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2032 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1322 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2752 mm |
