1954 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 715 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Riley RM A | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Riley | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | RM A | SL |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 613 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4633 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2099 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2585 mm |