1954 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1326 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2561 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3700 mm |
