1954 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Toyota Venza
To start off, 2013 Toyota Venza is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,700 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Venza is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Venza weights approximately 555 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Toyota Venza is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Venza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Venza has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Venza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Riley RM A | 2013 Toyota Venza | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Venza |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2775 mm |
